From the category archives:

Sales Management

Undoubtedly, The Beatles were a successful band. But was there more than talent at work to help build their success? Malcolm Gladwell has written some of the best selling non-fiction books of the 21st century.  They include ‘Blink’, ‘Tipping Point’ and more recently, ‘Outliers’, which examines some of the factors that contribute to personal success.

One of the interesting points which Gladwell highlights is that there are sometimes aspects beyond an individual’s control which play an important part in success. These can be environmental, cultural or historical. And a second point is that there are also actions which an individual can take to increase their chances of success – despite the circumstances they find themselves in.

As salespeople our success is measured openly every month – and if there are things we can do (or not do) to increase our chances of success, we’d be wise to do these things. This short article will see what we can learn from Gladwell’s book – and then provides some actions we can take to apply these insights in our sales world.

Before we look at what we can do – let’s quickly look at one of the examples Gladwell cited regarding external factors which impact success but which are beyond our control (or are they?).

Sales lessons from junior hockey players

Ice hockey is the national sport of Canada – and has strong junior competitions from a young age. Like many junior sports, the better players have an opportunity to play in regional competitions as well as local competitions. By their mid to late teens, players are beginning to emerge who will go on to play professionally. It would be reasonable to assume that a regional representative team of the best 16 year olds would have a spread of birthdays across the 12 months of the year. This was not the case for a recent set of teams examined. In fact – 70% were born in the first half of the year (January to June) – and the remainder in the second 6 months. This seems surprising – given that by sixteen, many boys would be of a similar skill level and physical maturity across their peer group.

Why has this happened? And what does it mean for success?

A Canadian psychologist – Roger Barnsley – first drew attention to this phenomenon of relative age in the mid 1980s. It’s not that boys of age 16 or 18 are particularly different in abilities – the reason is that boys of 9 and 10 are. The cut-off age for being selected for rep teams is January 1. So a boy turning 10 on that date would be competing for selection with other boys who are also turning 10 much later in that calendar year – and there is a physical difference between boys of this age. But – shouldn’t this even out by the later teen years? Theoretically, perhaps, but by then a type of self fulfilling prophesy has set in. The older boys when selected in the first rep sides receive better coaching, play more games, and play with and against better players. In this environment it’s understandable that they will continue to develop their skills – and be selected as 11 year olds, then 12 year olds and so on.

So – in this environment – success is skewed based on age, not talent. The lesson is that – if we want to ensure we get the best talent and give people an even opportunity to succeed – we need to ensure that artificial barriers are not placed in front of people. Often these barriers are hard to see form the inside and can be processes that have been developed over time. Rarely is the intent to skew talent development –after all, the coach of any elite team would want to see all potential stars be given the opportunity to shine.

Some lessons for sales managers:

  • Ensure that all team members are given opportunities to display and develop their skills and abilities. Tailor development programs to suit individual experience and skill levels;
  • Provide ample opportunity for all to work in environments where they can display their talent. All territories are not created equal – and not all product categories provide the same opportunities. Especially for newer team members – ensure opportunities are fair;
  • Don’t judge performance too quickly. Expertise needs time to develop – many managers have unrealistic expectations of what salespeople (especially new salespeople) can achieve in short time frames. And early success can simply be due to blind luck – be wary of quick comparisons between peer groups.

Some lessons for salespeople:

  • Sometimes we find ourselves in situations where the odds are against us – despite our best efforts. In the hockey example, some younger kids were doing their best, but their chances against taller, faster and more skilled players were simply not even. So – don’t be too hard on yourself by making unrealistic comparisons to more successful performers.  Continue Reading…

{ 0 comments }

Why sales leaders make bad decisions

by Paul Sparks on May 10, 2011

We’ve all done it – and will no doubt do it again.  Despite our best thinking, we make bad decisions.  And when our job is to make the sale or manage the sales process, bad decisions can have ramifications that everyone else in our organisation can see.

It was always handy for Captain Kirk to have an un-emotional, rational lieutenant in the form of Mr Spock to guide his decisions as they went boldly where no one had gone before. Today, Vulcan side-kicks are hard to come by – and they can have their own peculiar problems.

However, perhaps there’s a way for us to channel our inner Mr Spock and apply a little more intention to our decisions – and get better results in the process.

Recent research presented in the Harvard Business Review by Andrew Campbell, Jo Whitehead and Sydney Finkelstein, has shown that there are reasons why we make poor decisions – and outlines actions we can take to reduce our chances of making bad decisions.  This article will review some aspects of this research and apply the findings to a sales and sales management setting.

The core of the problem with human decision making, say Campbell and his co-authors, lies with two hardwired processes that we all rely on when we make decisions.  Our brains lead us to do two things:

  1. recognise patterns, based on our experience; and
  2. interpret these patterns in an emotional manner – again based on personal experience.

Both these things have been developed to allow us to operate in a complex world. In a more primitive setting it’s important to be able to quickly recognise whether a person is a friend or a foe; whether the pretty berry we’re about to eat is sweet or poisonous; and whether the charging woolly mammoth is heading our way.

In today’s organisational setting, we also make quick decisions. Is the meeting the boss has called really important – or can I afford to skip it; can I incorporate the data from last month’s report in the new report I’m writing; can we reallocate our warehousing space to defer a move to new premises for another 12 months.

We make thousands of decisions every day. Many are inconsequential in the larger scheme of things; some will have unintended consequences which may be good or bad; and yet others will have major consequences – again good or bad – and often we don’t give some of these the decisions the attention they deserve.

The reason?

Pattern recognition and emotional tagging.

Pattern recognition helps us make quick decisions – which are usually appropriate. It helps us know which foods are safe to eat, and to know which meetings to make sure we attend. Our very survival can depend on these decisions, and we make them without thinking at all about the information we’ve processed, the conclusions we’ve drawn and the actions we’ve taken.

The typical journey from home to office is full of life and death decisions that we don’t think about. We wait for the light at the crossing to turn green before we cross – and even then we take another look in case an impatient driver is late for their arrival. We choose to wait until it is safe before we alight the tram. And again we take care to avoid passing traffic. We take care to avoid the icy pathway, and go another way. And so it goes.

As well as our experience of previous patterns making our life easy – and safe – as we journey to work, we also make some decisions based on previous emotional experiences. We choose not to walk down a particular laneway which would make our journey shorter because it felt unsafe when we used it 12months ago. We avoid sitting in a certain section of the tram carriage because we nearly missed our stop when we sat there on another occasion – even though it may mean standing up.

We are creatures of habit – based on past experience which informs our behaviour today. Continue Reading…

{ 0 comments }

Over 70 people interested in learning the latest ideas, trends and innovation in professional selling and sales management joined me recently at Luna Park in Sydney for the fourth Sales Effectiveness breakfast event for 2010.  As with the first series, the feedback was fantastic – I hope to see you for the fifth breakfast for 2010 on October 15, 2010.  Till then, here are some highlights from September for you.

Sally-Anne Cotton“The alchemy of 21st century selling: aligning balance, congruence and intent to deliver golden results” 

Sally-Anne opened her presentation by pointing to a growing body of evidence to demonstrate that organisations with strong adaptive cultures which are based on shared values will outperform companies with a rigid or weak culture by a significant margin.

 Based on these studies, Sally-Anne presents a compelling case for the need for all sales teams to achieve balance, congruence and alignment to allow positive cultures to thrive, and, consequently, for organisations to thrive.  These items can be summarised like this:

Balance – between the needs of customers, salespeople, sales teams and organisations

Alignment – between the values and beliefs of the individual salespeople and the vision and mission of the organisation

This balance and alignment between individuals and organisations then needs to be delivered with intention.  This intention needs to be purposeful and focussed on the common good.  When combined in an authentic manner – the chance of long term individual and organisational success is dramatically increased.

Find out more by ordering your copy of the DVD of the full presentation:

http://www.saleseffectiveness.com.au/sales-effectiveness-breakfast-event-series-september-2010/

Mo FoxWhat you see is not always what you get: changing how you perceive things to achieve better sales results

Mo’s presentation was in interactive delight.

Her message for salespeople – in fact for all of us – is that we need to understand that underlying structures and patterns exist everywhere – and that the better we understand these structures and patterns, the better outcomes we will achieve.

Mo took us on a journey to discover our inner artist.  Artists understand structure – and the structure that Mo taught us was the human face.  Despite some protestations and suspicion, we all took up our crayons, and proceeded to draw one of our breakfast companions.  For most of us, our early efforts were somewhat juvenile – and a touch embarrassing. 

However, when we were learnt some basic underlying structures – where eyes sit in faces, the relationship between our ears and our eyes, and a few more – our second efforts overall were much better than our first.

A great lesson for those of us in sales.  Look for underlying structures in our customers and prospects business.  Look for patterns in our clients industries.  Take the time to look and the picture we build will take on greater clarity – and deliver vastly improved outcomes.

Find out more by ordering your copy of the DVD of the full presentation:

http://www.saleseffectiveness.com.au/sales-effectiveness-breakfast-event-series-september-2010/

  Continue Reading…

{ 0 comments }

Three things sales managers must do to ensure sustainable team success

by Paul Sparks 3 October 2010

Sales Performance International (SPI) is a global leader in helping companies market and sell high-value solutions. In his role as the director of business development at SPI, Tim Sullivan works with clients to find and capture the best practices of the world’s top performing sales professionals and teams.  He is a co-author of one of [...]

Read the full article...

Does poaching star sales performers really work?

by Paul Sparks 20 August 2010

It’s so tempting isn’t it – employ the sales guy or gal from the opposition company that are setting the world on fire.  Then all our problems will be solved.  Sales figures will soar, and, as managers, we’ll go from zero to hero just by poaching that star performer. Or will we? There are lots [...]

Read the full article...

What sales teams can learn from Led Zeppelin & Wolfmother, or, why Boomer sales managers are a great fit for Gen Y salespeople

by Paul Sparks 16 January 2010

Formed in England in 1968, Led Zeppelin went on to become the highest selling rock act of the 1970s.  Although known for their hard rock sound, the band had a range of styles, and produced one of the most played acoustic songs ever written – the much loved (and loathed) “Stairway to Heaven”. If you’re [...]

Read the full article...

Rethinking rewards for your sales team

by Paul Sparks 5 January 2010

What motivates salespeople? What incentives really drive the outcomes individuals and organisations are looking for?  Do big commissions work? Dan Pink has popularised research in psychology, and is well known for his work “A Whole New Mind”. Over the last few years he has researched the impact of rewards in the workplace.  Put simply, he [...]

Read the full article...