Posts tagged as:

Personal Development

Undoubtedly, The Beatles were a successful band. But was there more than talent at work to help build their success? Malcolm Gladwell has written some of the best selling non-fiction books of the 21st century.  They include ‘Blink’, ‘Tipping Point’ and more recently, ‘Outliers’, which examines some of the factors that contribute to personal success.

One of the interesting points which Gladwell highlights is that there are sometimes aspects beyond an individual’s control which play an important part in success. These can be environmental, cultural or historical. And a second point is that there are also actions which an individual can take to increase their chances of success – despite the circumstances they find themselves in.

As salespeople our success is measured openly every month – and if there are things we can do (or not do) to increase our chances of success, we’d be wise to do these things. This short article will see what we can learn from Gladwell’s book – and then provides some actions we can take to apply these insights in our sales world.

Before we look at what we can do – let’s quickly look at one of the examples Gladwell cited regarding external factors which impact success but which are beyond our control (or are they?).

Sales lessons from junior hockey players

Ice hockey is the national sport of Canada – and has strong junior competitions from a young age. Like many junior sports, the better players have an opportunity to play in regional competitions as well as local competitions. By their mid to late teens, players are beginning to emerge who will go on to play professionally. It would be reasonable to assume that a regional representative team of the best 16 year olds would have a spread of birthdays across the 12 months of the year. This was not the case for a recent set of teams examined. In fact – 70% were born in the first half of the year (January to June) – and the remainder in the second 6 months. This seems surprising – given that by sixteen, many boys would be of a similar skill level and physical maturity across their peer group.

Why has this happened? And what does it mean for success?

A Canadian psychologist – Roger Barnsley – first drew attention to this phenomenon of relative age in the mid 1980s. It’s not that boys of age 16 or 18 are particularly different in abilities – the reason is that boys of 9 and 10 are. The cut-off age for being selected for rep teams is January 1. So a boy turning 10 on that date would be competing for selection with other boys who are also turning 10 much later in that calendar year – and there is a physical difference between boys of this age. But – shouldn’t this even out by the later teen years? Theoretically, perhaps, but by then a type of self fulfilling prophesy has set in. The older boys when selected in the first rep sides receive better coaching, play more games, and play with and against better players. In this environment it’s understandable that they will continue to develop their skills – and be selected as 11 year olds, then 12 year olds and so on.

So – in this environment – success is skewed based on age, not talent. The lesson is that – if we want to ensure we get the best talent and give people an even opportunity to succeed – we need to ensure that artificial barriers are not placed in front of people. Often these barriers are hard to see form the inside and can be processes that have been developed over time. Rarely is the intent to skew talent development –after all, the coach of any elite team would want to see all potential stars be given the opportunity to shine.

Some lessons for sales managers:

  • Ensure that all team members are given opportunities to display and develop their skills and abilities. Tailor development programs to suit individual experience and skill levels;
  • Provide ample opportunity for all to work in environments where they can display their talent. All territories are not created equal – and not all product categories provide the same opportunities. Especially for newer team members – ensure opportunities are fair;
  • Don’t judge performance too quickly. Expertise needs time to develop – many managers have unrealistic expectations of what salespeople (especially new salespeople) can achieve in short time frames. And early success can simply be due to blind luck – be wary of quick comparisons between peer groups.

Some lessons for salespeople:

  • Sometimes we find ourselves in situations where the odds are against us – despite our best efforts. In the hockey example, some younger kids were doing their best, but their chances against taller, faster and more skilled players were simply not even. So – don’t be too hard on yourself by making unrealistic comparisons to more successful performers.  Continue Reading…

{ 0 comments }

Why sales leaders make bad decisions

by Paul Sparks on May 10, 2011

We’ve all done it – and will no doubt do it again.  Despite our best thinking, we make bad decisions.  And when our job is to make the sale or manage the sales process, bad decisions can have ramifications that everyone else in our organisation can see.

It was always handy for Captain Kirk to have an un-emotional, rational lieutenant in the form of Mr Spock to guide his decisions as they went boldly where no one had gone before. Today, Vulcan side-kicks are hard to come by – and they can have their own peculiar problems.

However, perhaps there’s a way for us to channel our inner Mr Spock and apply a little more intention to our decisions – and get better results in the process.

Recent research presented in the Harvard Business Review by Andrew Campbell, Jo Whitehead and Sydney Finkelstein, has shown that there are reasons why we make poor decisions – and outlines actions we can take to reduce our chances of making bad decisions.  This article will review some aspects of this research and apply the findings to a sales and sales management setting.

The core of the problem with human decision making, say Campbell and his co-authors, lies with two hardwired processes that we all rely on when we make decisions.  Our brains lead us to do two things:

  1. recognise patterns, based on our experience; and
  2. interpret these patterns in an emotional manner – again based on personal experience.

Both these things have been developed to allow us to operate in a complex world. In a more primitive setting it’s important to be able to quickly recognise whether a person is a friend or a foe; whether the pretty berry we’re about to eat is sweet or poisonous; and whether the charging woolly mammoth is heading our way.

In today’s organisational setting, we also make quick decisions. Is the meeting the boss has called really important – or can I afford to skip it; can I incorporate the data from last month’s report in the new report I’m writing; can we reallocate our warehousing space to defer a move to new premises for another 12 months.

We make thousands of decisions every day. Many are inconsequential in the larger scheme of things; some will have unintended consequences which may be good or bad; and yet others will have major consequences – again good or bad – and often we don’t give some of these the decisions the attention they deserve.

The reason?

Pattern recognition and emotional tagging.

Pattern recognition helps us make quick decisions – which are usually appropriate. It helps us know which foods are safe to eat, and to know which meetings to make sure we attend. Our very survival can depend on these decisions, and we make them without thinking at all about the information we’ve processed, the conclusions we’ve drawn and the actions we’ve taken.

The typical journey from home to office is full of life and death decisions that we don’t think about. We wait for the light at the crossing to turn green before we cross – and even then we take another look in case an impatient driver is late for their arrival. We choose to wait until it is safe before we alight the tram. And again we take care to avoid passing traffic. We take care to avoid the icy pathway, and go another way. And so it goes.

As well as our experience of previous patterns making our life easy – and safe – as we journey to work, we also make some decisions based on previous emotional experiences. We choose not to walk down a particular laneway which would make our journey shorter because it felt unsafe when we used it 12months ago. We avoid sitting in a certain section of the tram carriage because we nearly missed our stop when we sat there on another occasion – even though it may mean standing up.

We are creatures of habit – based on past experience which informs our behaviour today. Continue Reading…

{ 0 comments }

Over 75 people interested in learning the latest ideas, trends and innovation in professional selling and sales management joined me recently at Luna Park in Sydney for the sixth and final Sales Effectiveness breakfast event for 2010.  In a fitting end to the series, we discussed emerging trends in the world of professional selling ending with Michael Schiffner and Robin Gibson encouraging us to celebrate the “death” of sales training and to welcome the emergence of sales development as the new performance paradigm.   We’ll be back in 2011 with another series of events to inform and educate the sales community.  Until then, here are some highlights from November 2010 for you.

Giles Rhodes“A taxonomy of sales roles: matching performance & reward mix with different sales roles” 

Are you paying your sales people what they’re worth?

Are you paying too much – or too little?

Giles Rhodes gave us some insights into a recent study by consulting firm Aon-Hewitt which looked at over 25,000 sales roles and the pay structure associated with each role.

We know it’s important to get pay right – but with such a variation in sales roles, how is it possible to compare roles?  The study Giles discussed shed light on this by breaking sales roles into their components, and by so doing, a taxonomy of sales roles begins to emerge.

The Aon-Hewitt analysis identified 12 components that informed sales roles.  These included:

  • Sales mode – direct or channel
  • Sales focus – new business or account management
  • Team selling – sole operator or team member
  • Product or service selling
  • Sales cycle – long or short
  • Product focus – single product or product range
  • Plus another 6 parameters

This structured approach to describing sales roles by activities informs the pay structures of roles with specific requirements to ensure that managers match appropriate reward structures with particular sales activities.

Find out more by ordering your copy of the DVD of the full presentation:

http://www.saleseffectiveness.com.au/sales-effectiveness-breakfast-event-series-november-2010/

You’ll find more information about the local work done by HR firm Aon Hewitt here:

http://www.hewittassociates.com/Intl/AP/en-AU/Default.aspx

Michael Schiffner & Robin Gibson“Why sales training doesn’t work

Michael and Robyn began their presentation with a quick activity designed to both engage the audience (it’s an early morning event, after all), and demonstrate how our competitiveness can sometimes get in the way of achieving our goals.

Not only did this get the group up and moving – but it laid the platform for an engaging discussion on what is the function of sales training.  Michael’s key point is simple – but has extensive ramifications for how we approach training and preparing our sales teams.

Many of our current training models are mechanistic and more attuned to a time when our people were viewed as cogs in organisational machines.  Whilst this may have worked in days gone by – it doesn’t work in today’s world with today’s people.  What is needed is an organic approach to training – a developmental mindset.

Key to establishing this mindset is the application of the following three frameworks:

Create a sales development blueprint

Define individual development plans

Cultivate a coaching culture – with a focus on field coaching

Michael then shared his six step process for coaching sales people in the field:

Step 1 – Define the coaching objectives for the day

Step 2 – Pre-call Planning

Step 3 – Document your observations

Step 4 – Post-call Debrief and Feedback

Step 5 – Developmental Actions and SMART Goals

Step 6 – Feedback for you as a coach

Find out more by ordering your copy of the DVD of the full presentation:

http://www.saleseffectiveness.com.au/sales-effectiveness-breakfast-event-series-november-2010/

There’s more information about Michael Schiffner & Collective Intelligence here:

http://www.collectiveintelligence.net.au/

 Special Guest – Michelle Newton (Sales Training Manager Fairfax Media/Rural Press)“Lessons from 3000 hours of sales coaching 

Over the past 6 years Michelle Newton has co-ordinated the delivery of over 24 sales development programs to a sales force of over 500.  During this time she has personally delivered over 3000 sales coaching and training sessions in all parts of Australia and New Zealand – from Mt Isa to Launceston; from Perth to Auckland.

Michelle gave a wide ranging presentation, drawing on her extensive sales development experience, and also shared some insights to some emerging research about how the sales function differs due to the influence of gender, geography and generation.  Here are just a few of the many insights she presented:

  1. A casual approach to the sales function tends to be used by salespeople in the 40s who have resided in a town for 15 years or more
  2. Women salespeople like to know a lot about their clients but prefer a distant rather than a close relationship with clients
  3. Men talk more than women (really!)

If you missed the event – you can still see and hear the complete presentation set on DVD.  Order you copy here by registering as a virtual attendee of the breakfast series:

http://www.saleseffectiveness.com.au/sales-effectiveness-breakfast-event-series-november-2010/

 

********

Thanks for reading this post – Paul Sparks, Sales Effectiveness Australasia.

“Taking you beyond sales training and keeping you informed about the latest ideas, trends, innovation, research & best practice in professional selling and sales management”

{ 0 comments }

Highlights from the October 15 Sales Effectiveness breakfast

by Paul Sparks 6 November 2010

Over 70 people interested in learning the latest ideas, trends and innovation in professional selling and sales management joined me recently at Luna Park in Sydney for the fifth Sales Effectiveness breakfast event for 2010.  As with the previous four, the feedback was fantastic – I hope to see you for the final breakfast in [...]

Read the full article...

Highlights from the September 17 Sales Effectiveness breakfast

by Paul Sparks 30 October 2010

Over 70 people interested in learning the latest ideas, trends and innovation in professional selling and sales management joined me recently at Luna Park in Sydney for the fourth Sales Effectiveness breakfast event for 2010.  As with the first series, the feedback was fantastic – I hope to see you for the fifth breakfast for [...]

Read the full article...

Why all leading salespeople must become authors – and how you can start today

by Paul Sparks 2 October 2010

How important are you for your clients to stay in touch with? Why would potential clients want to meet you? We know that professional selling is undertaking a major revolution in approach, application and execution.  We know that if you don’t bring extra value to the sales encounter – then you should expect to be [...]

Read the full article...

Why understanding empathy is the key to your future sales success

by Paul Sparks 5 September 2010

What if the key to sales success was NOT greed, self-focus and a relentless push for decisions which are often not in the buyer’s best interest? What if uncompromising competition was NOT the way to build quality and add value? What if salespeople could do what many feel an innate desire to do – create [...]

Read the full article...